compare · image
PNG vs WebP
Compare PNG vs WebP: file size, transparency, SEO, and browsers. Measured examples and use-case winners. Free online tools.
Updated 2026-05-21
Use Image Color Picker
Side-by-side comparison
| Factor | PNG | WEBP |
|---|---|---|
| file_size | Larger (lossless) | Often 25–35% smaller at similar quality |
| transparency | Full alpha | Full alpha |
| browser_support | Universal | All modern browsers; legacy IE no |
| seo_crawl | Fully supported | Supported by Google; use with fallbacks |
| editing_workflow | Every editor | Growing; export from Figma/Photoshop |
When to use which
- logos and UI with sharp edges: PNG
- hero photos on the web: WEBP
- email clients: PNG
- LCP-critical page images: WEBP
FAQ
- Is WebP better than PNG?
- For photos and large web assets, WebP is usually smaller at similar visual quality. PNG wins for lossless workflows and universal email support.
- Does Google index WebP images?
- Yes. Use WebP with a fallback for older clients if needed.
- Which format for logos?
- PNG for crisp edges and transparency in design handoff; WebP for serving on your site with compression.