compare · developer

Base64 vs Base62 Comparison

Compare Base64 vs Base62 encoding: character sets, URL safety, URL shorteners, and binary efficiency. Free online encoder and decoder.

Updated 2026-09-07

Usar Base62 Encoder

Side-by-side comparison

Factor BASE64BASE62
character_set 64 chars (A-Z, a-z, 0-9, +, /)62 chars (A-Z, a-z, 0-9)
url_safety Requires URL-safe variant (- and _) or %2B encoding100% natively URL-safe without escaping
padding Uses = padding to align 24-bit blocksNo padding characters required
url_shorteners Can produce punctuation that breaks in text messagesIndustry standard for short links and YouTube-style IDs
cryptography_mime Universal standard for PEM certs, JWTs, and emailUsed primarily for token generation and IDs
density_efficiency 6 bits per character (33% size expansion)~5.95 bits per character (slightly more compact)

Cuándo usar cuál

  • URL shorteners and slug generation: BASE62
  • JWT tokens and binary API transmission: BASE64
  • Query parameters without special escaping: BASE62
  • Data URIs and image embedding in HTML/CSS: BASE64

Preguntas Frecuentes

Why is Base62 better for URLs than Base64?
Base64 includes '+' and '/' characters, which have special meanings in URL query strings and paths, requiring percent-encoding (%2B and %2F). Base62 contains only A-Z, a-z, and 0-9, making it natively URL-safe without any escaping.
Does Base62 use padding characters?
No. Base64 requires '=' padding characters to align to 24-bit boundaries. Base62 converts values using arbitrary-precision mathematical base conversion without padding.
Which is more compact, Base64 or Base62?
Base64 is slightly more space-efficient for raw binary data (~6.0 bits per char vs ~5.95 bits for Base62), but Base62 saves space in URLs by avoiding percent-encoding.
What are the most common uses for Base62?
Base62 is the global standard for URL shorteners (like Bit.ly), unique tracking tokens, and alphanumeric database IDs (like YouTube video IDs).

Herramientas relacionadas